
Are biologists playing God?
One of the most controversial issues surrounding synthetic biology, and genetic engineering in general, relates to the question of manipulating DNA, which at times is labeled as the fundamental element of what defines "life." If we define life in this way, then the manipulation of life's components can be seen as an act of "playing God" on the part of the scientists, and this argument has indeed been vocalized by the Vatican and other religious organizations. How far does this argument go and what does this argument do politically and practically for driving the path of synthetic biology research? Also, how can we think about the ways that synthetic biology might change our concepts of the fundamentals of life in more subtle ways?


Ted Peters Book
Book: Ted Peters, "Playing God? Genetic Determinism and Human Freedom"
(paperback; Routlage, New York; 1997) with a Foreword by Dr. Francis S.
Collins while he was Director of the NIH Human Genome Project and is currently Director of all of NIH. Ted Peters is Professor of Systematic Theology at Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary and the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences at the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, CA
by L. Stephen Coles, M.D, Ph.D., UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
09/02/2010
Playing God?
In responding to a question about the potential risks of manipulating human DNA paraphrased as, “Aren’t you trying to play God?,” Watson said, "But, Madam, if we don't play God, who will?"
– Dr. James D. Watson, Nobel Laureate, in a five part television series on PBS-TV entitled DNA (aired Sunday Nights in January/February 2004).
by L. Stephen Coles, M.D., Ph.D., UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
02/02/2010